And please increase dronebay I would like to Carry spare ones.
i can only Carry. 2 sentry 2 heavy 5 light With the change

What I and many others are saying that in order to make use of this power it is necessary to remove one drone link augmentor as this is replaced by the extra turret (no spare slot to fit it)

so, CCP Rise... on a scale of 1 to 10 how terrified are you now that capitals and super capitals are next on your list of things to re-balance?

Quote of the day "There are none so blind as those who will not see"

Alvatore, Somehow i post yet another long post explaining the whole situation and you totally ignore what I say to keep to your previous preconception of what you think I mean.

Are you sure we are speaking the same language?

I specifically address these points, and bring them to attention, and somehow it is me who does not consider them?

EPICURUS does not want an extra buff,

Putting these ships out as they are, will be like opening a bridge without it's structural supports, it will not end well.

Unless the issues discussed are dealt with,
The superdrone concept will now not have the chance to be cleanly evaluated.

However if we ignore the issues that are staring us in the face to give you, your "super-buff missile boat with drones too! Gäó" , the rage against superdrones will be horrific to witness, and the superdrones will be entirely the wrong target and wrongly despised.

The superdrone Idea is an excellent one, it will particuarly change the way we use drone cruisers, free from the shackles of nurse-maiding sentries, free to roam the battlefield.. CCP Rise has hit the ball out of the park with this one, it is an excellent idea. And valid on all classes of ships as well.

But if it is not implemented as PART of the drone weapon system, retaining the pillars of supporting smaller drones, and control range that matches the range of the drones it fields, then it will appear to fail. It will fail because it was not implemented well, to satisfy those who wanted extra DPS at all costs. Believing that somehow hurting the drone systems, will balance out the extra power given to the missiles.

It will be an opportunity lost forever, CCP will NEVER get a second chance to make a good first impression, they will either drop it, or be forever playing catch-up.

So in a nutshell, retain bonuses to drones smaller than the primary weapon system (Keeping the same number of effective light drones) , retain the drone control range currently utilised by players with the fitting of 2 DLA. Give a reasonable buff to missile damage or application, not an extra launcher.

I'm just not understanding what is wrong with 81km drone control range (my skills + T2 DLA) and great DPS. What efficient play style is really bring handicapped by that? I'm talking about both PVP and PVE here. Particularly for PVE, I just don't see the problem. Rats are rarely further than that and if they are, they'll come closer.

Why should the rattlesnake Not have to sacrifice.

There is a reason why the snake was only going for 400 mil when the other pirate faction battleships were going for more than twice as much.

Hmm average, is that the one where there is no world hunger and everyone has a $250,000 dollar salary?
Average means nothing, how much were they fetching when they were announced, how much now, what is the trend.

Hint:- through the floor

It would interest me to know how many people relied on using light drones on a battleship platform, and for what.

Hardly surprising that ship balancing threads are a bloodbath. When the loudest believe they must win at whatever cost to the people who use them.

Shall I start campaigning to have auto cannons on mining barges because it makes sense to me, miners need to defend themselves etc, what about hybrid bonuses on amarr hulls, after all lasers are the worst performing weapon system, let's do it and drain eve of yet more color and intrigue.

Plus eve is not a space shooter.

I'm disappointed in you a Alvatore, it's not a strawman to suggest that racial bonuses have racial flavour, after all this is a game in which you get to create a character in an imaginary yet consistent world and pick a race..

Well...Its not like anyone ever fits shields to Dominixes or ishtars is it.

I see you dont know what a utility high is.

I am glad you think so. It is easy to think that only one poster disagrees with you, when you disregard them when they post, troll them and seem to forget about them just as quickly. Lots of people are fed up to the back teeth with it.

As for Ranting I suggest that that word does not mean what you think it means.
Pretty much like every post that everyone has made that you do not like.

I know reading is like ~effort~

But even on this page,In fact even in the post you are quoting, you will find that your assumptions about what I think are completely and totally false. But you know this already. never let facts and information get in the way.

Edit.
Oh here is the post that you are so desperately trying to bury in the swarm of trolls that you do not want people to see. Wonder why?
Link Redacted Due To Spam

You lack the positive sec status usually asociated with missioning competence :) Let a true carebear to speak about ships and missions , please ...

Doesnt stop us wanting it. Its like my wish for a mega with a capital jump drive bolted onto it.

Nobody trains a snake because they want specialized high-DPS.

All that wind and you ignore the fact that the Rattlesnake does not need these changes. All it needs is more high/mid/low slots.

I did read that, thanks.

Yet I believe that was for the power level those ships had at the time of Apocrypha. Everything has been buffed in that area and none of the sansha ships are consideres dps-solo-wft-bbq-pwn-mobiles.

I wouldn't say wise, I belive that megathrons belong in frigate gangs.

But these posts are not moving things onwards, so I am a little tired now, as every one of your replies is either an attack as you know best, or a disruption to cause mayhem.

While I agree, I don't think a full set of bonused drones counts as a little better.

But eh, I suppose the fitting differences are what really make that up.

Well not quite, definitely more of a missile emphasis with the current proposals, but so nearly there, so near.

I have tried to hold my tongue, if you and your friends, or alts, or just sympathisers, i really to not care are attempting to get your Victim to respond with threats of violence or racial slurs or some other behavior, to get him banned. You are sad sad and mistaken.

You (singular or group) have for some reason picked me out as a victim, totally make up what I am meant to have said, and in little cycles, while your posts still exist, attempt to cause as much psychological harm and upset as is humanly possible.those coming new, will naturally wonder what is going on as they have not seen the ongoing nature of this (thank God!)

You forget the EvE-O forums are real world! My wife and family are disgusted that such behaviour is permitted or even legal and have suggested that such bullying should be reported to the police.

As EvE is international and knowing which countries laws might apply, even if illegal in most, I have suggested that It be left to the moderators, as it has recently been seen to be effective recently with erotica1

So respectfully STOP I did not choose to be a victim of your gang warfare.

Or is that why you have attacked me so mercilessly, to make sure that anyone who wants to discuss this and suggests changes, either is broken by you and your friends (whatever) and not just to bully and torture them for your sadistic pleasure?

So you actually have a reason too?

Sadly - while his work and posting is valuable - it's not the kind I'm hoping for the most.

Ah well, time to fire up SiSi again soon.

moron. Why do you keep putting your dumbass opinion on here? Nobody gives a damn what a no-life idiot, like you, thinks.

We did get to figure out that a mack will now earn over 80 mil/hr in highsec level 3 missions

He is also Tempban Darkfall and Frumpylumps Faplord, if you care.